LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

NISHA vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 24 September, 2021

Cites 1 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
2021 INSC 537Crl.A. No.-001080-001080 - 2021Official PDFAuthor HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEBench Shripathi Ravindra BhatAdvocates SHASHANK SINGH
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1080 OF 2021
(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.4259 of 2021)
NISHA Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Respondent
O R D E R

Leave granted.

This appeal arises out of final judgment and order dated

07.05.2021 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Gwalior in

MCRC No.22186 of 2021.

Apprehending her arrest in connection with crime registered

pursuant to FIR No.104 of 2021 dated 23.03.2021 lodged with Police

Station Mehgaon, District Bhind, Madhya Pradesh, in respect of the

offences punishable under Sections 304-B/498A/34 of the Indian

Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

1961, application seeking anticipatory bail was preferred by the

appellant in the High Court. The application having been rejected

by the order presently under challenge, the instant appeal has been

preferred.

Vide order dated 22.06.2021, while issuing notice, this Court

SignaturegrantedNot Verified interim relief in the following terms:

Mukesh Nasa

According to the affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of the

State, the investigation is complete and the charge-sheet has

already been filed on 26.06.2021 in respect of some of the accused.

However, the charge-sheet has not yet been filed against the

appellant because of the interim order passed by this Court.

We have heard learned counsel for the parties.

Mr. Varun Thakur, learned Advocate appearing for the original

complainant invited our attention to various issues including the

fact that second complaint was filed in respect of pressure sought

to be exerted by the family of the accused.

Considering the totality of the circumstances, in our view,

the appellant is entitled to the relief of anticipatory bail.

We, therefore, allow this appeal and set-aside the order

passed by the High Court and direct:

a) In the event of the arrest of the appellant in

connection with the aforestated crime, the arresting

officer shall release the appellant on bail on her

furnishing cash security in the sum of Rs.25000/-

(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) with two like

sureties.

b) The appellant shall render complete cooperation in

the ensuing investigation.

c) The appellant shall not in any manner misuse the

liberty granted to her.

d) Any infraction or violation of the aforestated

conditions shall entail in cancellation of the

relief of anticipatory bail granted to the

appellant.

With the above observations, the appeal is allowed.

New Delhi, September 24, 2021