INHERENT JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NOS.337, 340, 353, 360 AND 386 OF 2021
ASHA RAM (D) THR. LRS & ORS. ETC. ETC. …Petitioners
Versus
U.P AWAS EVAM VIKASH PARISHAD & ANR. ETC. …Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NO.384 OF 2021
YASIN (D) THR. LRS. & ANR. …Petitioners
Versus
U.P AWAS EVAM VIKASH PARISHAD & ORS. …Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NOS.359, 377, 378, 379, 387 OF 2021
DINESH KUMAR ETC. ETC. …Petitioners
Mukesh Nasa U.P AWAS EVAM VIKASH PARISHAD & ORS. ETC.ETC. …Respondents
O R D E R
Applications for listing Review Petitions in open Court are rejected.
Applications for permission to file Review Petitions are allowed.
The judgment under review had considered the rival submissions and all the
circumstances on record and then concluded that compensation awarded by the
Reference Court at the rate of Rs.120/- per square yard was the correct measure and
that the market value determined by the High Court could not be sustained either on
the basis of the sale-deeds or on the strength of judicial order.
We have gone through the contents of the Review Petitions. None of the
ground raised in support of the Review Petitions makes out any error apparent on
record to justify interference in Review Jurisdiction.
All the Review Petitions are, therefore, dismissed.
[Uday Umesh Lalit]
[Hemant Gupta]
[S. Ravindra Bhat] New Delhi;
December 08, 2021.