1 Mr Kapil Sibal and Mr Pinaki Misra, senior counsel appearing on behalf of the
respondents, stated that though according to the respondents, there was no
breach of the judgment of this Court dated 24 August 2020, in order to put an
end to the dispute, the respondents shall pay compensation to the petitioners at
the rate prescribed in the judgment of this Court and the amounts due (after
adjusting any compensation that may have been paid) shall be paid over within
a period of two weeks.
2 In view of the above statement, the contempt petition is disposed of.
3 Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
[Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud]
Sanjay Kumar
[Sanjiv Khanna] New Delhi;
January 28, 2022 -S-
ITEM NO.40 Court 4 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XVII-A
CONMT.PET.(C) No. 939/2021 in C.A. No. 6303/2019
KUNDAN BURNWAL & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
ALOK JAIN & ORS. Respondent(s)
Date : 28-01-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shankar Divate, AOR
For Respondent(s) Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Pinaki Misra, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Gyanendra Kumar, Adv.
Ms. Shikha Tandon, Adv.
Mr. Robin Grover, Adv.
Ms. Shree Sinha, Adv.
Mr. Zaid Drabu, Adv.
Mr. Sumit Attri, AOR for M/S. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas Aor, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
1 The contempt petition is disposed of in terms of the signed order.
2 Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER (Signed order is placed on the file)