LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

THE SUB REGISTRAR ERNAKULAM KOCHI 16 vs K. SYED ALI KADAR PILLAI on 24 March, 2022

Cites 0 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
2022 INSC 338C.A. No.-001326-001327 - 2010Official PDFAuthor Dinesh MaheshwariBench Dinesh Maheshwari, Aniruddha Bose, Jitendra Kumar MaheshwariAdvocates C. K. SASI | ROMY CHACKO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1326-1327 of 2010
THE SUB REGISTRAR ERNAKULAM KOCHI 16 APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
K. SYED ALI KADAR PILLAI & ANR. RESPONDENT(S)
JUDGMENT

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having

perused the material placed on record, we find no reason to

consider interference in the impugned judgment dated 02.04.2008,

particularly in view of the facts that the sale in question took

place under the supervision of the Company Court and even when the

auction bid of the respondent had been Rs. 1.935 crores for the

assets under sale, the Company Court had fixed the value of

immovable property therein at Rs. 1.4 crores; and the District

Registrar was also satisfied with that valuation. Therefore, stamp

duty was to be collected only on the said valuation i.e., Rs. 1.4

crores.

The impugned judgment, essentially proceeding on the peculiar

facts and circumstances of the present case, calls for no

interference.

The appeals stand dismissed, as such.

No costs.

Rajni Mukhi