LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs SHAIKH MAHEMUD on 6 April, 2022

Cites 1 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
2022 INSC 395C.A. No.-002784-002784 - 2022Official PDFAuthor V. RamasubramanianBench Hemant Gupta, V. RamasubramanianAdvocates SACHIN PATIL
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL No.2784 OF 2022
(arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.11652 of 2021)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA … APPELLANT(S)
Versus
SHAIKH MAHEMUD & ANR. … RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R

DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)

Date : 06-04-2022 This matter was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sachin Patil, AOR

For Respondent(s) Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, Adv.

Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, AOR

Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Gaurav Nair, Adv.

Ms Pranati Bhatnagar, Adv.

Ms. Anne Mathew, AOR

Mr. Aaditya S., Adv.

Ms. Pracheta Kar, Adv.

Mr. Nadeem Afroz, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

Arguments concluded.

Leave granted.

Appeal is allowed.

Reasons to follow.

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11652/2021

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 24-02-2021 in WP No. 3983/2020 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Bombay At Aurangabad)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

SHAIKH MAHEMUD AND ANR. Respondent(s)

(I.R. and IA No.90225/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.90226/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.90227/2021-APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING ORIGINAL VAKALATNAMA/OTHER DOCUMENT) (IA No. 90227/2021 - APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING ORIGINAL VAKALATNAMA/OTHER DOCUMENT)

IA No. 129111/2021 - APPLICATION FOR VACATION OF INTERIM ORDER IA No. 90225/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)

Date : 06-04-2022 This matter was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sachin Patil, AOR

For Respondent(s) Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, Adv.

Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, AOR

Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Gaurav Nair, Adv.

Ms Pranati Bhatnagar, Adv.

Ms. Anne Mathew, AOR

Mr. Aaditya S., Adv.

Ms. Pracheta Kar, Adv.

Mr. Nadeem Afroz, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

On 06.04.2022, the following order was passed :-

“Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

Arguments concluded.

Leave granted.

Appeal is allowed.

Reasons to follow.”

The reasoned order is being uploaded today i.e. on 09.04.2022.

Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, is/are disposed

of.

(Signed order is placed on the file)