LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

RITU RAI vs THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH on 29 September, 2022

Cites 2 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
2022 INSC 1040Crl.A. No.-001706-001706 - 2022Official PDFAuthor HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEBench Jamshed Burjor PardiwalaAdvocates YADAV NARENDER SINGH
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1706 OF 2022
(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.6535 of 2022)
RITU RAI Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. Respondent(s)
O R D E R

Leave granted.

This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 18.04.2022

passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Application

moved under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973

being No.19717 of 2021.

The appellant is the informant at whose instance Crime No.1592

of 2016 was registered at Police Station Sihani Gate, Ghaziabad,

Uttar Pradesh, against respondent no.2, for the offences punishable

under Sections 328, 376, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

After cognizance having been taken by the Trial Court,

Criminal Case No.192 of 2019 is presently pending.

During the pendency of the trial, application Exh. 61Kha was

moved on behalf of the appellant praying that Principal/In-

SignatureCharge/concernedNot Verified Officer of Kendriya Vidyalaya No.4 DLW Campus, BABITA PANDEY

sheet of the appellant. The attempt was thus to prove the age of

the appellant which would have certain bearing upon the kind of

offence which, if proved, would be said to have been committed.

The application was accepted by the Trial Court as a result of

which the concerned person was summoned as a witness and the

document was placed on record. It may be noted here that the Admit

Card issued by the Examining Authority was already on record and as

a result of this exercise, mark-sheet of the appellant also got

produced on record.

In the meantime, the order passed by the Trial Court accepting

the application preferred by the appellant was under challenge in

Application No.19717 of 2021 at the instance of accused/respondent

no.2 herein. By order presently under challenge, the High Court

accepted the submissions advanced on behalf of the accused and was

pleased to set-aside the order passed by the Trial Court.

The result thus is that though the document is on record after

the person was duly examined as a witness, the order on the basis

of which the document was placed on record, now stands set-aside.

Having considered the matter carefully, in our view, the

application preferred by the appellant was rightly allowed by the

Trial Court and there was no occasion for the High Court to set-

aside the order passed by the Trial Court.

We, therefore, allow this appeal; set-aside the view taken by

the High Court and restore the order dated 12.11.2021 passed by the

Trial Court in connection with Application Exh. No.61Kha in

Criminal Case No.192 of 2019.

With these observations, the appeal is allowed.

(J.B. PARDIWALA) New Delhi, September 29, 2022