LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

SEBASTIAN DOMINIC vs K. HARRIS on 30 November, 2023

Cites 0 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
2023 INSC 1041C.A. No.-007885-007886 - 2023Official PDFAuthor Vikram NathBench Vikram Nath, Rajesh BindalAdvocates K. RAJEEV
2023 INSC 1041NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). OF 2023
(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) Nos.26867-68 OF 2019)
SEBASTIAN DOMINIC … Appellant(s)
VERSUS
K.HARRIS & OTHERS ETC. … Respondent(s)
J U D G M E N T

Leave granted.

2. The appellant herein was working as Reference Assistant in

the University1. He was promoted to the post of Assistant Librarian vide

order dated 06.04.2010 w.e.f. 23.07.2008 as he had requisite

qualifications, i.e., MLISC2 and M.Phil in Library Science from VMU3.

M.Phil degree was obtained by him in December 2007. A decision was

taken by the Academic Council of the University on 03.04.2013 holding

that the degrees acquired through Distance Education from VMU

Signature

Digitally signedcannotNot Verifiedby be considered for promotion under University Grants

1 Kerala Agricultural University

2 Masters Degree of Library & Information Sciences

3 Vinayak Missions University Commission Scheme. The Executive Council endorsed the decision of

the Academic Council on 14.08.2014. The action was sought to be taken

against the appellant as he had been granted promotion on the basis of

his qualification of M.Phil from VMU, on a complaint made by

respondent No. 1. Two Writ Petitions were filed in the High Court—first

by the appellant-Sebastian Dominic seeking quashing of the decisions

taken by the Academic Council and the Executive Council refusing to

accept the degrees awarded by VMU through Distance Education and

second by K. Harris challenging promotion of Sebastian Dominic and

Sherly B to the post of Assistant Librarian. Further prayer was made for

grant of promotion to him with retrospective effect from 24.06.2008.

The Single Judge of the High Court4 opined that the action was taken

by the Academic Council in view of the complaint made by K. Harris

regarding validity of M.Phil degree of the appellant. Despite the

decisions of the Academic Council and the Executive Council, the

matter was still kept pending and consequential orders were not being

passed. Direction was issued for passing the appropriate order within

a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of the order. The

writ petition filed by the appellant was dismissed. The Division Bench

4 High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam of the High Court in a challenge to the common order passed by the

Single Bench upheld the same.

3. Learned counsels for the parties have addressed arguments

on a legal issue that M.Phil degree obtained by the appellant from VMU

was not valid and therefore, he was ineligible for grant of promotion to

the post of Assistant Librarian from the date he acquired that

qualification. However, considering the fact that the appellant was

granted promotion with effect from 23.07.2008 and continued working

till he retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation on

31.01.2018, in our opinion, the present appeals can be disposed of

while leaving the question of law open but not disturbing the promotion

already given to the appellant as he has already retired from service

more than five years back. Ordered accordingly. Whatever benefits

have been granted to him shall not be disturbed.

New Delhi November 30, 2023.