LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

R ANNAMALAI vs LALITHA SUBANAM on 16 April, 2025

Cites 3 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
2025 INSC 513Non-reportableC.A. No.-005222-005222 - 2025Official PDFAuthor HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEBench Puligoru Venkata Sanjay Kumar, Aravind KumarAdvocates M.P. PARTHIBAN
2025 INSC 513NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. OF 2025
(arising out of SLP(C) No. 2140 of 2022)
R. ANNAMALAI ..... APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
LALITHA SUBANAM ..... RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R

Leave granted.

The appellant, R. Annamalai, and the respondent, Lalitha

Subanam, got married on 14.02.2000. The sister of the appellant, R.

Annamalai, had gotten married to the brother of the respondent,

Lalitha Subanam, on the same day.

It appears that, for several reasons the respondent, Lalitha

Subanam, started residing separately in the year 2006. Litigation also

commenced with the appellant, R. Annamalai, filing a petition under

Section 9 in 2006 and, thereafter, under Section 13 of the Hindu

Marriage Act, 1955. These petitions were subsequently withdrawn.

It also appears that disputes had arisen between the sister of

the appellant, R. Annamalai, and the brother of the respondent,

Lalitha Subanam, which led to litigation between them. However, now

The appellant, R. Annamalai, and the respondent, Lalitha

Subanam, also lived together for some time after the initial breakup,

but have again separated and are not residing with each other.

In 2012, the appellant, R. Annamalai, filed a petition for

divorce, being H.M.O.P. No. 361/2012, before the Family Court,

Madurai. The Family Court passed a decree of divorce on 24.06.2015.

The respondent, Lalitha Subanam, preferred an appeal, which was

allowed by the impugned judgment dated 01.04.2019, setting aside the

decree of divorce.

During the pendency of the present appeal, several attempts were

made at mediation to settle the matter but they were not successful.

It is apparent that the marriage between the appellant, R.

Annamalai, and the respondent, Lalitha Subanam, has irretrievably

broken down. They do not have any emotional connect with each other.

In these circumstances, we exercise our jurisdiction under

Article 142 of the Constitution of India and direct dissolution of the

marriage between the appellant, R. Annamalai, and the respondent,

Lalitha Subanam, on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage.

The appellant, R. Annamalai, agreed to pay an amount of ₹25,00,000/-

(Rupees twenty five lakhs only) to the respondent, Lalitha Subanam.

The said amount will be deposited before the Family Court, Madurai,

within 8 weeks from today. In case the amount is not deposited within

the time specified, the appellant, R. Annamalai, shall pay interest at

the rate of 7% per annum, compounded annually, from the date of this

order till the date the payment is made.

The impugned judgment is set aside and the appeal is allowed in

the aforesaid terms.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.